Richard Rorty
American philosopher who argued knowledge is linguistic and contingent.
Richard Rorty was an American philosopher who became the most influential pragmatist of the late 20th century. He rejected the idea that knowledge involves representing reality correctly, arguing instead that knowledge is a matter of social linguistic practice. His work combined pragmatism with insights from both analytic and continental philosophy, making him a central and controversial figure.
- field
- Philosophy, history of ideas
- nationality
- American
- known_for
- Rejecting representationalism; pragmatism; ironism; works including Philosophy a
Lore & Background
He was the most influential of the late 20th century pragmatists along with Hilary Putnam and Robert Brandom. Inspired by the work of Willard Van Orman Quine and Wilfrid Sellars, who used a revised pragmatism to criticize logical positivism in the 1960s, Rorty developed a brand of pragmatism known sometimes as neopragmatism. Rorty's work gained influence through his systematic challenge to foundationalist epistemology, arguing that the mind does not mirror reality and that knowledge is instead a matter of social linguistic practice.
Reader's Guide
Rorty's significance lies in his role as the most influential late 20th century pragmatist. He was part of a renewed attention to pragmatism after Quine and Sellars used a revised pragmatism to criticize logical positivism in the 1960s. Rorty's neopragmatism gained influence through his arguments that knowledge is a linguistic and contingent affair, rejecting the traditional view that knowledge requires correct internal representations of external objects. He combined pragmatism with insights from analytic and continental philosophy.
Did You Know?
- Richard Rorty was the most influential of the late 20th century pragmatists along with Hilary Putnam and Robert Brandom.
- Rorty's neopragmatism gained influence after Willard Van Orman Quine and Wilfrid Sellars used a revised pragmatism to criticize logical positivism in the 1960s.
- Rorty rejected the traditional view that knowledge requires correct internal representations of external objects.
- Contemporary pragmatism may be broadly divided into a strict analytic tradition and a 'neo-classical' pragmatism that adheres to the work of Peirce, James, and Dewey.
More in Philosophers And Logicians 1-24
Elsewhere in the Philosophers And Logicians universe
Spotted an error? Know more?
This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record
